After reading the novel, I had to watch the film directed by Orson Welles. The Magnificent Ambersons is considered a classic film though not up to the level of Welles’ Citizen Kane. The film is quite faithful to the book, but I wished it included George with his rival redhead Fred Kinney, the part when Eugene falls over laughing when he sees how similar George and Fred’s conflict is to his own foolishness and how Lucy was not exclusive to George, how she would go dancing and socialize with other young men and how that made George feel so insecure.
The film was good, but not as full as the book, which is so often the case.
Welles had the actors in dark settings. I wished the mansions had more light. Buy some candles! Or get electricity!
The film was enjoyable and a classic. Reading the essay on Criterion, I learned how much Welles’ vision was altered:
But in Welles’ absence, RKO Studios recut the original version of the film mercilessly—Welles said it looked like it had been “edited with a lawn mower”—reducing its running time from 131 to the present 88 minutes. Nevertheless, what survives is still one of the most strikingly beautiful and technically innovative films ever to come out of Hollywood. It also tells a good story—about the decline of a once powerful and wealthy turn-of-the-century Midwestern family—with a conviction and maturity that are rare for the old Hollywood system.
I wish I could see the 133 minutes, but I’m glad I saw this.
Pingback: Charles Dawes’ House – Ruined for Life: Phoenix Edition